The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of HCI

HCI is very popular with organizations of all sizes now, but it’s not perfect.

You always need to reach a compromise between performance, flexibility, usability, and cost… this actually happens with practically every type of infrastructure, HCI included. What’s more, it’s quite hard to find a storage infrastructure that covers all the use cases you need to address.

HCI is a good compromise for small organizations, but some of the trade-offs imposed by this type of architecture design limit its potential in larger ones where there is a large, and established, environment to support as well.

Let’s put it this way, HCI is the perfect example of the 80/20 rule. The problem is that 20% of your infrastructure is expected to grow exponentially with AI/ML, IoT, edge computing projects and more. All things your organization is evaluating now and will impact your business competitivity in the following years.

The Good of HCI

What most of the end users like about HCI is its user-friendliness. There is no need to change the way they operate their infrastructure, using the same hypervisor they are accustomed to and fewer complications around storage management. The infrastructure is simplified thanks to the modular scale-out approach for which each new single node adds more CPU, RAM, and storage. As a result of this, HCI shows good TCO figures as well.

The Bad of HCI

Limitations of HCI arise from what makes it a good solution for ordinary workloads and virtualization. In fact, it’s not really designed to cover all type of workloads (think about big data for example). And not all applications scale in the same way – meaning that sometimes you need to add different types of resources to your infrastructure (e.g. storage-only nodes for capacity). Last but not least, most HCI products on the market have a specific focus on edge or core use cases, but are not able to cover both of them concurrently, efficiently at a reasonable cost. These limitations might be of secondary importance today, but if you look at them in the long term that could radically change….

To finish reading the full article of The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of HCI, please visit Enrico’s article on GigaOm’s site.

And to discover more as we dig deeper into this topic, Enrico will be hosting a webinar – Hybrid-Converged Infrastructure: Deploying HCI 2.0 with Existing SANs – with us where we will be talking about how to deploy Hybrid-converged Infrastructures. Yes, you read it right, it’s not hyper- but Hybrid-converged, and if you want to learn more about it sign up and join us!

Related Posts
Robert Bassett
Evolving Toward Application-Centric Infrastructure
Digital Transformation is a story of evolution towards application-centric infrastructure. In that story, applications connect to a fluid data infrastructure, where storage technologies meet the…
Transforming Software Development: Our Experience with TC2 Agile Methodology
One of the reasons doing agile transformations is difficult is that there is no specific formula for how to do it. The starting point and context for…
Alexander Best
Stories from the Bit-Shift, or What Means 512N vs. 512e vs. 4kN vs. Flash-Pages
Today, let’s talk about how bits are packed into flash drives and HDDs and why that matters.  The terms 512N and 4kN describe physical sector…